Monthly Archives: July 2015
SNH Chairman Dr John Markland also warned against complacency, telling delegates he felt there is still a long way to go towards a sustainable Scotland. While there was a huge amount of activity already in place to move towards a more sustainable society, there was no room for complacency, she stated. SEPA chairman Ken Collins told the conference that profound social and economic problems could be tackled by concerted action to improve the environment. These were just some of the key messages to over 250 delegates at the State of Scotland’s Environment and Natural Heritage conference held in Edinburgh.
We must ensure everyone has a say in protecting their immediate environment, be careful not to over exploit our natural resources, and prioritise the establishment of a set of sustainable development indicators. A clean and protected environment should be one of the key factors to providing a sustainable society for all Scotland’s people. No water pollution was reported during the clean-up which is a very positive E-Web marketing service outcome, underpinned by advice from SEPA staff. SEPA has continued to support the State Veterinary Service and Scottish Executive during this period in providing advice on environmental protection.
In Scotland, the cleansing and disinfection work at infected and neighbouring premises is complete and re-stocking has started in some areas. There have been no new officially confirmed cases of foot and mouth disease in the UK since 30 September and in Scotland the last case was confirmed at the end of May. SEPA staff are also giving advice on the sealing and restoration work at Birkshaw Forest to reduce contamination leaching from the site and prevent run off to nearby watercourses.
The information on groundwater quality is being collected on behalf of the Scottish Executive to inform their management actions. Local rivers remain unaffected at the burial site, and weekly samples from groundwater monitoring wells confirm that the risk of pollution is low. Routine monitoring is continuing at the main burial sites in Scotland and SEPA is focusing on the mass burial site at Birkshaw Forest because of the scale of activity there
Comparisons have referred to Closure 2 when no traffic was able to access the A36 north of Limpley Stoke. However, the report does recognise that the differences between closure 1 and closure 2 could be marked and, as a consequence, some comparisons between closure 1 and closure 2 are also included within this report. Appendix A refers to press releases issued by the Highways Agency in August, October and November 2002, in relation to the closure period. The Highways Agency, in conjunction with Atkins Highways and Transportation (who are the agents for this maintenance area contract), announced the planned diversionary routes in August 2002.
Vehicles would be diverted off the A36 at Warminster on to the A350 towards Chippenham and on towards junction 17 of the M4 or via the A4 towards Bath. Southbound vehicles were advised to use this route in reverse. Strategic diversion signs were in place on the A36 and the M4 well in advance of the route choice decision point. For traffic which had inadvertently used junction 18 and the A46, they were again signed away from Bath and the A36 Limpley Stoke via the A420.
The Monitoring Programme recognised that although strategic diversionary routes and local diversionary routes would be advertised. both strategic and local traffic are more aware of opportunities for routing via less suitable routes and as such the monitoring programme sought to capture all possible alternative movements. The Monitoring Programme was conducted at the behest of Government Office and WPS by the local authorities.
These counters were installed immediately prior to the closure and collected only several days worth of information from the before period. Figures 4.1 and 4.2 detail the location of these counting sites for the local authorities. Best Service of Google Adwords, The local authorities generally adopt their own individual site numbering systems and these have been appended to the plans to allow ease of reference to the tabulations detailed in Appendix B which refer to the data collected both before and during the closure period.4
These count sites provided both volumetric axle counts as well as classifying vehicles into two distinct categories, those vehicles under or over 5.2 metres in length. The information provided (0700 – 1900) by the local authorities was disaggregate to allow interpretation for the 12 hour time period. Data is also available for the AM and PM peak periods. For the purposes of the interrogation of this data.